by Joanne Griffin
•
1 March 2025
In 1965, Time magazine declared that by 2000, Americans would work just 20 hours a week, retiring at 50 with ‘a guaranteed income for life.’ “Many scientists hope that in time the computer will allow man to return to the Hellenic concept of leisure, in which the Greeks had time to cultivate their minds and improve their environment while slaves did all the labor,” the article continued. The slaves, in modern Hellenism, would be the computers. Yet here we are, a quarter century after that prediction, grinding through intense work weeks while doomscrolling through other people’s vacations and wellness rituals. Here’s the uncomfortable truth: Every time technology offers to save us time, we invent new ways to stay busy . Email was supposed to kill paperwork. Instead, we send 300 billion emails a year. Slack was supposed to kill email. Instead, we send 1.5bn messages per week. History is littered with predictions about technology freeing us from work: 💡Aristotle (350 BCE): ‘ If every tool could perform its own work, slavery would be unnecessary .’ 💡John Maynard Keynes (1930): ‘ Our grandchildren will work three hours a day .’ 💡 Fei-Fei Li, Professor of Computer Science at Stanford University (2020s): ‘ I imagine a world in which AI is going to make us work more productively, live longer, and have cleaner energy .’ These visionaries agreed on one thing: Technology should serve humans. But history shows we’d rather serve technology. With every technological leap forward we tend to follow Amara’s Law : we overestimate liberation, underestimate adaptation. We don’t eliminate work; we upgrade it.